Asus TUF Gaming FX705DU_FX705DU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	66.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX705DU_FX705DU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX705DU
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 20 '24 at 22:20
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Memory 69.5 1-Core 108 2-Core 191 69% 123 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 474 46% 377 Pts	64-Core 485 30% 485 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Asus(1043 10DF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	66.7% Good	Lighting 82.3 Reflection 90.1 Parallax 77.6 67% 83.3 fps	MRender 94 Gravity 79.9 Splatting 72.2 66% 82 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,240 Write 2,088 Mixed 2,008 471% 2,112 MB/s	4K Read 54.6 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 69.4 225% 74.8 MB/s	DQ Read 856 DQ Write 614 DQ Mixed 714 539% 728 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 741GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 117 119 117 116 117 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Read 124 Write 123 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 116 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 6.4 4K Mixed 0.6 244% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD Kingston 9905700-026.A00G 16GB 288 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.7% Very good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 24.3 74% 25.8 GB/s	SC Read 19.5 SC Write 26.4 SC Mixed 20.5 63% 22.1 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 38: 0P 4R 3G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
38%	52%	31	211	58	144	23.8"	1280 720	MSI3BA4 MSI G241

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX705DU_FX705DU Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705DU_FX705DU

CPU
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	135x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	68x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	67x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	46x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	26x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	11x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	13x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	13x
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 21,753 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16