Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory20.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMar 20 '24 at 10:56
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 91.7
1-Core 132
2-Core 255
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 728
73% 593 Pts
64-Core 725
45% 725 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 146
Parallax 135
109% 138 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 140
Splatting 123
103% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 564 240 222 211 206 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,893
Write 1,203
Mixed 888
SusWrite 268
235% 1,063 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 70.6
237% 82.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,059
DQ Write 820
DQ Mixed 913
690% 931 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 207%
Great: 259%
1TB PCS 2.5" SSD 1TB
170GB free
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 85 12 282 6.9 6.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 492
Write 384
Mixed 378
SusWrite 135
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 22.4
106% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 34.8
83% 165 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 97%
Intel 670p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$79
433GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1224 1267 1272 921 149 244 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 1,472
Write 1318
Mixed 1,050
SusWrite 846
263% 1,172 MB/s
4K Read 59.8
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 78.5
249% 82.7 MB/s
DQ Read 868
DQ Write 870
DQ Mixed 589
520% 776 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 227%
Great: 383%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 137 137 132 138 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 120
Write 135
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 136
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FBD 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
84.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 26.6
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 26.9
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 40: 0P 5R 5G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 39% 36 216 59 60 27" 1280 720 AUS27AE ASUS VP278
History: Score 22: 0P 0R 4G 10B | Score 40: 0P 5R 5G 0B
Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,024
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback