Asrock H410M-ITX/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	76.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	75% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H410M-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200723
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Mar 20 '24 at 09:14
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	89% Excellent	Memory 91.9 1-Core 125 2-Core 237 86% 151 Pts	4-Core 463 8-Core 771 75% 617 Pts	64-Core 982 61% 982 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6170) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.42 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.6% Very good	Lighting 93.5 Reflection 105 Parallax 106 76% 101 fps	MRender 92.7 Gravity 94.9 Splatting 95.4 77% 94.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk G5 BICS4 1TB 7,638 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 152 129 120 111 116 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	75% Very good	Read 336 Write 388 Mixed 197 SusWrite 129 59% 262 MB/s	4K Read 39 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 23.8 144% 55.4 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 101 117% 208 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 114%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB 74,123 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 122GB free Firmware: 415000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 201 135 128 185 205 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Read 241 Write 421 Mixed 145 SusWrite 194 57% 250 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 52.9 169% 63 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 315 DQ Mixed 142 163% 280 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 117%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB 4,772 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	78.6% Very good	MC Read 30 MC Write 30.7 MC Mixed 22.2 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 23.2 69% 24.2 GB/s	Latency 62.7 64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 12: 0P 1R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
12%	12%	52	217	58	165	27"	1280 720	SAM72FC LS27CG51x

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H410M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 59%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock H410M-ITX/ac

CPU
Core i5-10400Intel $99Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	28x
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	23x
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples	20x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	11x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	10x
RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	9x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $54Bench 191%, 5,987 samples	7x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	5x
MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 62%, 5,980 samples	4x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	7x
2x8GBINNO8G3000SBench 77%, 8 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $391

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16