Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230317
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '24 at 08:00
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 87.7
1-Core 186
2-Core 375
114% 216 Pts
4-Core 736
8-Core 1,197
118% 966 Pts
64-Core 1,711
106% 1,711 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 113%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 121E) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 528.79
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 17.8
14% 17.5 fps
MRender 14.9
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 16.3
14% 16.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FP6512G 512GB
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMG1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1393 317 320 315 319 320 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,163
Write 1,667
Mixed 1,364
SusWrite 497
265% 1,173 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 223
4K Mixed 67.3
274% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,392
DQ Write 1,037
DQ Mixed 1,164
884% 1,197 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 214%
Great: 270%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 36.6
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 43.8
SC Mixed 29.9
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 109%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 26 6 60 27" 1280 720 TBD0270 HDMI
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,726 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback