Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateMar 20 '24 at 06:51
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 68.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 186
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 500
49% 399 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 62%
Great: 66%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.1% Average
Lighting 57.1
Reflection 63.1
Parallax 51.7
46% 57.3 fps
MRender 42.5
Gravity 50.7
Splatting 49.5
39% 47.6 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 46%
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 14.4
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 19.7
12% 15.9 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 13
11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ3 256GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.T
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 181 186 177 163 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 659
Write 617
Mixed 560
SusWrite 212
115% 512 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 38.1
132% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 618
DQ Write 532
DQ Mixed 496
394% 549 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 106%
Great: 131%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
911GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 64 62 63 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 68
Write 104
Mixed 55
SusWrite 63.6
53% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.2
216% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.2% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 26.1
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 22.3
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,836 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback