HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemHP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8704
Memory54.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '24 at 20:16
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 216
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 715
67% 556 Pts
64-Core 950
59% 950 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Vega Frontier Edition-$1,000
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.21018.6011
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.2% Above average
Lighting 62.6
Reflection 62.3
Parallax 63
51% 62.6 fps
MRender 59.5
Gravity 59.4
Splatting 59.6
49% 59.5 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB-$145
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620361WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1642 1704 1655 1522 1493 1476 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 1,155
Write 1,583
Mixed 1,270
SusWrite 1,582
317% 1,397 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 64.9
220% 76 MB/s
DQ Read 882
DQ Write 738
DQ Mixed 798
601% 806 MB/s
Poor: 293%
This bench: 247%
Great: 666%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$37
817GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 118 117 118 118 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 113
Write 116
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 118
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB-$351
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.2% Very good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 22.6
72% 25 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 21.9
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 172%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 35 144 31.5" 1280 720 GSM7766 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx Builds (Compare 3,715 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

System: HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $434
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback