Viglen VIG800S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemViglen VIG800S  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q87M-E
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 19 '24 at 16:51
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 190
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 358
48% 358 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 365B) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.22% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.57 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.22%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$45
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 496
Write 476
Mixed 451
106% 474 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 47.4
154% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 128%
WD Elements 25A2 1.5TB
1TB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 149
Write 107
Mixed 75.9
131% 111 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.8
195% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
53.6% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 16.7
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 0P 2R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 60% 10 96 58 60 27" 1280 720 DELD0A0 SE2717H/HX
Typical VIG800S Builds (Compare 615 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Viglen VIG800S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback