Lenovo 90JL00E8MW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemLenovo 90JL00E8MW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36E7
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201123
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMar 19 '24 at 15:58
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 236
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 682
72% 576 Pts
64-Core 689
43% 689 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
MSI(1462 3510) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.1% Poor
Lighting 36.8
Reflection 41
Parallax 38
30% 38.6 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 27.3
27% 34.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM128GDHTNG-8310B 128GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80060C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 71 71 60 57 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 873
Write 87.7
Mixed 171
SusWrite 65.6
64% 299 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 28.6
118% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 91.6
DQ Mixed 75.2
82% 143 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
481GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 122 121 125 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 172
Write 164
Mixed 92.4
SusWrite 122
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 14.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 15.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 33 75 27" 1536 793 AUS27AA VG275
Typical 90JL00E8MW Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 90JL00E8MW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $173
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback