Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 214%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 238%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics198% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive400% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '24 at 15:15
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 175
2-Core 346
110% 205 Pts
4-Core 674
8-Core 1,295
117% 984 Pts
64-Core 2,318
143% 2,318 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 110%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$615
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
198% Outstanding
Lighting 289
Reflection 279
Parallax 331
236% 300 fps
MRender 331
Gravity 242
Splatting 182
198% 252 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 198%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1640 2281 2393 2436 2363 2302 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
400% Outstanding
Read 2582
Write 2,570
Mixed 2,413
SusWrite 2,236
552% 2,450 MB/s
4K Read 73.3
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 104
335% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,400
DQ Write 1,090
DQ Mixed 1,224
922% 1238 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 400%
Great: 435%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
40GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 197 61 61 59 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 448
Mixed 388
SusWrite 142
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 55.3
183% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
26GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 237 80 70 65 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 471
Write 359
Mixed 408
SusWrite 154
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 85.4
4K Mixed 43.9
151% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 121%
Samsung 970 EVO 2TB
126GB free
Firmware: 3108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 360 354 318 339 357 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 356
Write 360
Mixed 351
SusWrite 344
80% 353 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 40.1
134% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 240
176% 230 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 93%
Seagate Expansion 5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 119 111 112 112 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 87.3
Write 119
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 113
71% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
178% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
21GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 95 91 91 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 81.6
Write 89.2
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 92.8
58% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
129% Outstanding
MC Read 56
MC Write 43.9
MC Mixed 44.9
138% 48.3 GB/s
SC Read 31.8
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 42.3
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 129%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 35: 0P 2R 5G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
35% 71% 24 215 57 240 26.9" 1280 720 GBT270E AORUS FI27Q-X
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,823 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback