HP EliteBook 830 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive383% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP EliteBook 830 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83B3
Memory16.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231208
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 19 '24 at 14:25
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8650U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 72.7
2-Core 127
55% 90.6 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 256
21% 184 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 83B3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.01% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 8.8
4% 6.83 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 8.7
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.01%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$190
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 235 430 368 356 548 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
383% Outstanding
Read 3,952
Write 3,384
Mixed 3393
SusWrite 395
620% 2,781 MB/s
4K Read 194
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 174
596% 173 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 236
207% 310 MB/s
Poor: 261%
This bench: 383%
Great: 564%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9E02] CMSX32GX4M2A3200C22 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 20
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 17.9
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 96.1
42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 11 60 13.2" 1280 720 AUO472D
Typical EliteBook 830 G5 Builds (Compare 1,178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 830 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback