Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 165%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 174%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics200% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive436% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory57 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '24 at 23:37
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 68.3
1-Core 136
2-Core 273
85% 159 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 976
90% 755 Pts
64-Core 1,479
92% 1,479 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6950-XT
XFX(1EAE 6950) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.2.1
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
200% Outstanding
Lighting 250
Reflection 266
Parallax 515
204% 344 fps
MRender 412
Gravity 220
Splatting 345
267% 326 fps
Poor: 183%
This bench: 200%
Great: 214%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
809GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3479 3460 3475 3471 3493 1358 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
436% Outstanding
Read 2,125
Write 3,470
Mixed 2,351
SusWrite 3,123
629% 2,767 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 244
4K Mixed 95.8
346% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1,369
DQ Write 1,066
DQ Mixed 1,164
886% 1200 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 436%
Great: 441%
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
864GB free
Firmware: P9CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3296 3497 3499 3517 3503 2714 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
452% Outstanding
Read 2,227
Write 3,492
Mixed 2,336
SusWrite 3,338
647% 2,848 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 237
4K Mixed 94.1
338% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 1,388
DQ Write 1,068
DQ Mixed 1,191
901% 1,216 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 452%
Great: 441%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
27GB free, PID 9917
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 96.1
Write 122
Mixed 9.7
92% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 2.4
138% 5.9 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK32GX4M2D3200C16 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK32GX4M2D3200C16 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.9% Good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 26.4
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 27.7
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 212 58 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0F96 U32R59x
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $25

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $851
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback