Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415DAP_M415DA

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	4.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

1 month ago, 1 month ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415DAP_M415DA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X415DAP
Memory	1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220415
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '24 at 21:44
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Graphics 10,258 User benchmarks, average bench 38% FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	23.6% Poor	Memory 36.7 1-Core 66.1 2-Core 117 40% 73.3 Pts	4-Core 57.8 8-Core 147 12% 102 Pts	64-Core 153 9% 153 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics 17,211 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 1FAF) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.44.13 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	4.13% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 7.3 Parallax 6.1 3% 5.8 fps	MRender 6.9 Gravity 5 Splatting 8.8 6% 6.9 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.13% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3128B-AB1 128GB 222 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: EDFK0SA6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 43 53 48 42 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.8% Average	Read 191 Write 87.2 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 49.2 18% 83.1 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 53.4 4K Mixed 24.8 81% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 174 130% 174 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 173%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 929GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 320 356 350 362 380 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Read 366 Write 374 Mixed 360 SusWrite 351 82% 363 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 22.8 4K Mixed 21 70% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 94.4 DQ Mixed 89.2 70% 97.5 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron MT40A512M16TB-062E:R Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GB 227 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 3200, 3200 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	47% Average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 16 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 14.9 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 198 20% 198 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	49	31	60	13.9"	1280 720	AUO723C

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415DAP_M415DA Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415DAP_M415DA

CPU
Ryzen 3 3250U GraphicsAMDBench 38%, 10,258 samples	145x
Athlon Gold 3150U GraphicsAMDBench 45%, 2,359 samples	12x
Athlon Silver 3050U GraphicsAMDBench 35%, 5,719 samples	10x

GPU
Radeon GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 17,211 samples	152x
Radeon Vega 3 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 27,821 samples	15x

SSD
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	58x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	42x
P900F128GH 128GBForeseeBench 86%, 300 samples	28x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GBMicronBench 67%, 2,461 samples	40x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 19,438 samples	38x
4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 1x4GBMicronBench 35%, 7,475 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16