HP 280 G1 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 280 G1 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B34
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150302
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 11 '18 at 16:08
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 203
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 402
53% 398 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
Asus(1043 83CD) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
3.8% Terrible
Lighting 4.57
Reflection 5.04
Parallax 3.44
4% 4.35 fps
MRender 6.71
Gravity 4.93
Splatting 3.52
4% 5.06 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.8%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT725050VLA380 500GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V56OA73A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 48.8
Write 53.4
Mixed 50.6
38% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.32
77% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 40%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
138GB free
Firmware: KC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 80.3
Write 78.8
Mixed 72.3
58% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 0.81
4K Mixed 0.44
82% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 88%
BUFFALO HD-PNTU3 500GB
97GB free, PID 01e7
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 38.6
Mixed 11.8
35% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.29
50% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team--Elite-1333 Kingston 99U5474-023.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 280 G1 MT Builds (Compare 1,155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 280 G1 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $194
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback