Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QA_F510QA

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QA_F510QA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X510QA
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190703
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '24 at 14:20
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	93%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR) 17,422 User benchmarks, average bench 35% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Memory 45.9 1-Core 48.8 2-Core 92 37% 62.2 Pts	4-Core 134 8-Core 146 18% 140 Pts	64-Core 147 9% 147 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 1931) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.44.13 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 7.6 Parallax 10.4 0% 6.03 fps	MRender 6.6 Gravity 7.9 Splatting 6.6 6% 7.03 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W256G1102 256GB 3,311 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6106002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 101 99 101 109 115 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54% Above average	Read 214 Write 160 Mixed 198 SusWrite 108 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 49.5 4K Mixed 27.2 103% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 147 114% 159 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD CT8G4SFS824A.M8FE 16GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.9% Poor	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 9.7 25% 8.83 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 6.5 15% 5.4 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	24	4	60	15.5"	1366 715	BOE0704

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QA_F510QA Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QA_F510QA

CPU
A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 35%, 17,422 samples	60x
A10-9620P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 35%, 6,180 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	60x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 13,858 samples	1x

SSD
SD9SN8W128G1102 128GBSandiskBench 67%, 2,914 samples	20x
SD9SN8W256G1102 256GBSandiskBench 69%, 3,311 samples	5x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1102 512GBWDCBench 143%, 1,898 samples	4x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	10x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	4x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16