HP 550-227c

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 550-227c  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B52
Memory5.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 18 '24 at 03:30
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-8850 Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
42.5% Average
Memory 52.6
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 123
46% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 191
25% 190 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 2B53) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.81% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 12.7
7% 9.93 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 9.7
Splatting 8.1
7% 7.97 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.81%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
779GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 384 387 392 380 373 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 450
Write 403
Mixed 326
SusWrite 382
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 33.2
115% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 194
158% 225 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 137%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 2TB
2TB free, PID 0906
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 129 127 129 128 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 127
Write 136
Mixed 19.1
SusWrite 128
135% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
37% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
26.9% Poor
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 10
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 7.6
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 166 56 60 72.3" 1280 720 SNYEA01 SONY TV
Typical 550-227c Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 550-227c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $42
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback