Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics75.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230224
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 18 '24 at 02:22
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 83.3
1-Core 142
2-Core 277
91% 167 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 1042
94% 790 Pts
64-Core 1,482
92% 1,482 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$212
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Lighting 95.4
Reflection 92.2
Parallax 86.2
78% 91.3 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 80.8
Splatting 73.1
71% 89.6 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
729GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 453 443 451 459 454 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 478
Mixed 379
SusWrite 439
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 95.6
4K Mixed 43.9
156% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 302
247% 350 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 112%
Great: 137%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
688GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 467 456 476 474 476 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 483
Mixed 433
SusWrite 458
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 51.7
176% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 370
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 120%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 35.4
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 35.6
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 214 56 60 24.9" 1280 720 HWP3322 HP 25er
Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $442
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback