Asrock A520M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics81.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock A520M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '24 at 18:26
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 78
1-Core 155
2-Core 307
96% 180 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 884
89% 725 Pts
64-Core 1,062
66% 1,062 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Sapphire(1DA2 E451) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.9% Excellent
Lighting 84.7
Reflection 129
Parallax 161
69% 125 fps
MRender 149
Gravity 87.3
Splatting 150
107% 129 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 93%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria G2 SSD 1TB
226GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFA17.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 764 522 592 590 573 578 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1293
Write 1,651
Mixed 928
SusWrite 603
252% 1,119 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 50.4
166% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,088
DQ Write 793
DQ Mixed 896
681% 925 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 182%
Great: 251%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 32GB
3600, 3600 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 28.7
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 29.2
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 23.8" 1720 1080 MSI4BA4 MSI G242
Typical A520M-HDV Builds (Compare 720 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback