Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics65.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD5  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '24 at 21:09
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3680-$180
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 94.5
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 175
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 531
54% 436 Pts
64-Core 641
40% 641 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.6% Good
Lighting 80.4
Reflection 82.4
Parallax 68.1
66% 77 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 74
Splatting 69.3
66% 82.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 120 76 77 5.6 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 352
Write 220
Mixed 243
SusWrite 79.8
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 31.5
4K Mixed 23.4
77% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 136
116% 171 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 99%
Seagate ST2000VN 004-2E4164 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 119 132 134 157 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 155
Write 151
Mixed 70.4
SusWrite 133
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.9% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 12
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 11.6
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 722 2 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0F35 U32J59x
Typical GA-X58A-UD5 Builds (Compare 345 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback