Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive311% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMar 16 '24 at 20:38
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 155
2-Core 298
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 907
90% 736 Pts
64-Core 1,080
67% 1,080 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc A750
Intel(8086 1021) ≥ 4GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.4% Above average
Lighting 97.3
Reflection 144
Parallax 222
79% 154 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.13 fps
Poor: 82%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 109%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
715GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234200WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2038 2328 1166 906 571 231 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
311% Outstanding
Read 2670
Write 2,368
Mixed 2,165
SusWrite 1,207
471% 2,102 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 65.7
244% 88.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,393
DQ Write 1,113
DQ Mixed 1,229
926% 1,245 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 311%
Great: 469%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-4000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 47.4
MC Write 50.4
MC Mixed 39.7
131% 45.8 GB/s
SC Read 33.9
SC Write 53.9
SC Mixed 37.2
119% 41.7 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 128%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 217 57 165 24" 1280 720 SPT6C05 Sceptre M27
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,882 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,005
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback