Asrock Z370 Gaming K6

Performance Results


Gaming 88% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 80% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	87.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	76.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock Z370 Gaming K6 (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171122
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '18 at 14:37
Run Duration	241 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	Memory 93.5 1-Core 136 2-Core 263 92% 164 Pts	4-Core 532 8-Core 790 82% 661 Pts	64-Core 1,131 70% 1,131 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3302) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Lighting 112 Reflection 115 Parallax 109 91% 112 fps	MRender 95.5 Gravity 101 Splatting 97.7 80% 98 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$90 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR021 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8136 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 309 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 94 94 92 (AE) Unknown 100 100 106 (B7) Unknown 100 100 2 (B8) Unknown 98 98 2 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 70 48 223339020318 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 7 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 94 94 6 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 99717919354 (F7) Unknown 100 100 3119316867 (F8) Unknown 100 100 1144871915 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4414 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	76.7% Very good	Read 468 Write 333 Mixed 333 84% 378 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 68 4K Mixed 18.8 92% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 267 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 48.7 86% 171 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 105%
Seagate ST2000DL001 2TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 880GB free Firmware: CC92 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 88 109571632 (03) Spinup time 94 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 8034 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 82 62 190677993 (09) Power-on hours count 49 49 44891 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1984 (B7) Unknown 89 89 11 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 6401 (BC) Unknown 100 98 51540394081 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 48 555810849 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1684 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 6565 (C2) HDA temperature 33 52 64424509473 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 116 99 109571632 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 94 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 94 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -49112950989092 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2970751376 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2414884325	66.5% Good	Read 116 Write 116 Mixed 109 85% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.19 70% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 71%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 794GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 230 162 3500 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1131 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 3968 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 84 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 59 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5119 (C2) HDA temperature 122 108 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	62.1% Good	Read 119 Write 97.1 Mixed 91.5 77% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 1.97 4K Mixed 0.13 83% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 101%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 268GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 209 177 6550 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2156 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 22038 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 167 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 105 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 182 182 55503 (C2) HDA temperature 119 104 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	79.5% Very good	Read 142 Write 135 Mixed 111 97% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 2.29 4K Mixed 0.21 88% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 87%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 240GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 205 180 6750 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1683 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10804 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 133 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 86 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 190 190 32710 (C2) HDA temperature 120 104 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	57% Above average	Read 110 Write 88.7 Mixed 96.2 74% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.18 4K Mixed 0.27 87% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 101%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 3.5TB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	67.9% Good	Read 158 Write 109 Mixed 34.7 112% 100 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 6.06 4K Mixed 0.53 265% 5.91 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 76%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 377GB free, PID 3322 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Read 110 Write 76.4 Mixed 74.3 105% 86.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 7.6 4K Mixed 0.48 277% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x4GB-$40 28,855 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	93.3% Outstanding	MC Read 36.2 MC Write 36.9 MC Mixed 26.1 94% 33.1 GB/s	SC Read 20 SC Write 38.3 SC Mixed 28.8 83% 29 GB/s	Latency 61 66% 61 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z370 Gaming K6 Builds (Compare 974 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Gaming K6

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	562x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	153x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	126x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	108x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	62x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	39x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	34x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	31x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $34Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	37x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $755

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16