Asus CM1855

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	97.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus CM1855 (all builds)
Memory	0.5 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120924
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 16 '24 at 18:12
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8120 25,690 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	60.2% Good	Memory 85.6 1-Core 55.4 2-Core 111 54% 84 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 313 31% 252 Pts	64-Core 313 19% 313 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Device(1B4C 13A3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97.3% Outstanding	Lighting 117 Reflection 106 Parallax 121 95% 115 fps	MRender 178 Gravity 109 Splatting 98.3 101% 128 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 106%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB 56,609 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 557GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKZ1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 276 377 380 379 371 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 113 Write 65.1 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 344 31% 138 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 13.8 4K Mixed 9.6 38% 12 MB/s	DQ Read 12.1 DQ Write 13.2 DQ Mixed 12.2 9% 12.5 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SLA302G08-GGNHC SLA302G08-GGNHC SLZ302G08-GGNHC 10GB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.6% Poor	MC Read 11 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 7.1 26% 9.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 1.7 18% 6.27 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	55	60	23.5"	1280 720	ACI249A ASUS VS247

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CM1855 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CM1855

CPU
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	17x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	10x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	5x

GPU
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples	6x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	3x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	2x
M4 128GBCrucial $116Bench 60%, 34,516 samples	1x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

RAM
MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GBAdataBench 54%, 2,816 samples	4x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	3x
AO2L16BC8R2-BR2S Corsair CML16GX3M2A1600C10 16GBAdataBench 25%, 4 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $211

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16