Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA401QM_GA401QM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA401QM_GA401QM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GA401QM
Memory29.6 GB free of 40 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230811
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateMar 16 '24 at 18:04
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 73.5
1-Core 160
2-Core 322
97% 185 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 833
88% 701 Pts
64-Core 1,039
64% 1,039 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 1722) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.02.01
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 21.6
Parallax 28.1
17% 23.7 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 23.2
17% 20.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS2000GB 2TB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8442101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 715 379 20 548 263 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 1,022
Write 1,236
Mixed 447
SusWrite 325
169% 758 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 3.2
74% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 752
DQ Write 21.7
DQ Mixed 34.7
113% 270 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 98%
Great: 242%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Adata 39GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 32767 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
65.5% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 21.2
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 23.4
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 144 14" 1280 720 SHP1523 LQ140M1JW49
Typical ROG Zephyrus G14 GA401QM_GA401QM Builds (Compare 2,634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA401QM_GA401QM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback