Asrock H61M-VG4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VG4  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600x900x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 16 '24 at 16:43
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 82.9
2-Core 169
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 315
42% 315 Pts
64-Core 316
20% 316 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
Asus(1043 0470) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1260 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.2% Average
Lighting 61
Reflection 69.1
Parallax 76.9
50% 69 fps
MRender 60.8
Gravity 56.4
Splatting 42.2
42% 53.1 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 191 80 18 70 10 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25% Poor
Read 242
Write 220
Mixed 224
SusWrite 79.7
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.4
39% 9.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 25%
Great: 100%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 249GB
134GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 126 134 123 123 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 126
Write 115
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 128
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 72%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
69GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 115 111 110 111 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 147
Write 125
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 116
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.9% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 10.4
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 91.1
44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 203 56 60 19.5" 1280 720 DELD03C DELL E2014H
Typical H61M-VG4 Builds (Compare 437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VG4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $146
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback