Gigabyte H410M H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte H410M H  (all builds)
Memory0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200828
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMar 16 '24 at 09:02
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G6400
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 113
2-Core 212
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 306
40% 303 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1273
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
3% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 3
Parallax 3.6
2% 3.23 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 5.9
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 282
Write 41.1
Mixed 34
25% 119 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 1.8
27% 7.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
12GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 181 181 178 181 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 134
Mixed 85.6
SusWrite 182
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 102%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM2666HLH-4G 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 10.2
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 34%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 17 60 0" 1280 720 Default
Typical GA-H410M H Builds (Compare 3,284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte H410M H - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $426
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback