Lenovo 81FE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81FE  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '24 at 07:49
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 53.6
2-Core 154
59% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 273
32% 247 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 3963) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2127
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.5% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 8.1
6% 7.83 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 8.8
Splatting 0.3
5% 7.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.5%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKZ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 414 414 394 384 381 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 138
Write 65.3
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 396
36% 158 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 6.6
23% 7.97 MB/s
DQ Read 14.4
DQ Write 14
DQ Mixed 12.9
10% 13.8 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart Brazil SMS4TDC3C0K0446SCG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.6% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17.3
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 13.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO40EC
Typical 81FE Builds (Compare 404 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback