Lenovo 10M2S09W00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10M2S09W00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 30FD
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '24 at 07:43
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A6-8570E R5, 6 COMPUTE CORES 2C+4G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Memory 39.1
1-Core 52.9
2-Core 87.5
35% 59.8 Pts
4-Core 90.8
8-Core 85.3
12% 88.1 Pts
64-Core 85.4
5% 85.4 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Legend(17AA 30FD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 5.9
3% 4.77 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 5.9
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Emtec X160 512GB
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN15926
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 241 279 240 302 284 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 270
Write 301
Mixed 262
SusWrite 268
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 20
64% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 138
104% 141 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44CB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
18% Very poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.23 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 18%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 27.9" 1280 720 BNQ78DA BenQ GW2870
Typical 10M2S09W00 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10M2S09W00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback