Lenovo 21C8S0HB00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 21C8S0HB00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21C8S0HB00
Memory19.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231208
Uptime14.2 Days
Run DateMar 16 '24 at 02:53
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User JAM-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 48.9
1-Core 139
2-Core 240
75% 143 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 505
56% 444 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 50AE) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.40.84
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
8.93% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 16
8% 11.8 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 12.8
Splatting 15.7
10% 12 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.93%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZAL4256HBJD-00BL1 256GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL2QHXC7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 791 799 796 1172 1169 215 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,325
Write 1,172
Mixed 989
SusWrite 824
242% 1,078 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 54.9
182% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 552
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 485
334% 423 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 177%
Great: 234%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA4GS6CJR8N-XN 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.4% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 10.9
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 LEN40BA
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback