Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	7.53% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z87-D3HP
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140812
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 15 '24 at 21:56
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4430-$124 24,837 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	67% Good	Memory 82.7 1-Core 81.6 2-Core 163 64% 109 Pts	4-Core 298 8-Core 300 40% 299 Pts	64-Core 299 18% 299 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 74%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.3% Poor	Lighting 35.5 Reflection 39.9 Parallax 0.3 29% 25.2 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 37.6 Splatting 26.7 27% 34 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 33%
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	3.17% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 2.6 Parallax 6.4 3% 4.13 fps	MRender 7.9 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.6 4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.17% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB 24,911 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF3600RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 12 1.3 1.3 23 1.7 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	7.53% Terrible	Read 101 Write 54.5 Mixed 74.6 SusWrite 7.6 13% 59.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.2 11% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 7.53% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT51264BD160B.C16F 4x4GB 640 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	65.6% Good	MC Read 24.5 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 20.4 68% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 20.6 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	60	24"	1280 720	BNQ78ED BenQ GL2480

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z87-D3HP-CF Builds (Compare 812 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	184x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	158x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	134x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	72x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	31x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	25x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	22x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	28x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	21x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $210

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16