Asus H110M-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-F  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180803
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 15 '24 at 10:27
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User MNG-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 166
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 285
38% 285 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8566) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.7% Below average
Lighting 41.6
Reflection 44.7
Parallax 39.7
34% 42 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 35.1
30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC600256G 256GB
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S4800105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 405 419 415 407 408 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 355
Write 417
Mixed 384
SusWrite 399
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 52.2
170% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 168
177% 291 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 107%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MLVD48192MLD-24 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
40.4% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 11.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 12.3
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 18.9" 1280 720 DELF005 DELL E198WFP
Typical H110M-F Builds (Compare 198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback