To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	36.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190610
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 14 '24 at 17:06
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	40%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0 3,274 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 61.3 2-Core 144 57% 95 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 412 42% 339 Pts	64-Core 511 32% 511 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.1.1 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	36.7% Below average	Lighting 46 Reflection 52.7 Parallax 62.8 38% 53.8 fps	MRender 46 Gravity 45 Splatting 39.7 35% 43.6 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-ASM2NE6500GTTD 500GB 5,132 User benchmarks, average bench 271% 416GB free (System drive) Firmware: EGFM11.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1394 1478 1455 1484 1405 1509 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	184% Outstanding	Read 1,168 Write 1,744 Mixed 1,300 SusWrite 1,454 321% 1,416 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 56.2 4K Mixed 36.4 115% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 333 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 300 218% 286 MB/s
Poor: 148% ↑ This bench: 184% Great: 391%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 117GB free Firmware: 05.06H05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 56 56 56 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 58.6 Write 59.5 Mixed 43.5 SusWrite 55.8 40% 54.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 59%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 641GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 128 113 147 149 148 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Read 170 Write 166 Mixed 35.2 SusWrite 138 92% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1 2x8GB 190 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.6% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 14.1 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 8.4 27% 9.4 GB/s	Latency 82.1 49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	61	44	60	7.2"	1280 720	SAM04FD SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,577 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	713x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	279x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	264x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	616x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16