TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 21CU0001BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 21CU0001BR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21CU0001BR
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 14 '24 at 15:41
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 63.6
1-Core 157
2-Core 314
92% 178 Pts
4-Core 615
8-Core 884
94% 750 Pts
64-Core 908
56% 908 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 89.2%
 Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 50AB) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 23.10.24.05
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 24.3
14% 18.2 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 20.8
Splatting 19.2
13% 15.7 fps
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 13.6%
 Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL4-4D256-Q79 256GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5U879
SusWrite @10s intervals: 538 435 374 434 272 403 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,845
Write 1,752
Mixed 1,323
SusWrite 409
298% 1,332 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 95.9
4K Mixed 28.9
138% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 784
DQ Write 1,108
DQ Mixed 727
611% 873 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 182%
 Great: 212%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SMS4WEC8C2J2446SAG 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.1% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 10.1
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 34.1%
 Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 14" 1280 720 LEN40A6
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback