Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201014
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateMar 14 '24 at 09:44
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 71.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 207
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 622
64% 515 Pts
64-Core 821
51% 821 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Lighting 33.9
Reflection 41.8
Parallax 33.3
28% 36.3 fps
MRender 36.2
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 23.9
25% 31.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 43 41 42 44 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 470
Write 331
Mixed 306
SusWrite 72.1
65% 295 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 37.9
129% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 118
94% 131 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 85%
Dexp C100 256Gb 256GB
129GB free
Firmware: V0218A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 435 434 285 193 193 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 507
Write 432
Mixed 401
SusWrite 330
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 22.7
122% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 31.8
84% 170 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 29
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 24.8
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 67: 0P 5R 10G 12B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
67% 71% 38 216 57 120 23.5" 1920 1080 HPN36B8 HP X24c
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback