Asus H81M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-K (all builds)
Memory	0.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20160222
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 12 '24 at 19:05
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Memory 58.4 1-Core 58.8 2-Core 128 47% 81.7 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 244 28% 218 Pts	64-Core 193 12% 193 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 8C92) CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.79 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	19.8% Very poor	Lighting 22.7 Reflection 32.6 Parallax 25.9 18% 27.1 fps	MRender 32.9 Gravity 26.1 Splatting 24.4 22% 27.8 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$95 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 465GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 391 410 413 397 354 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Read 456 Write 427 Mixed 321 SusWrite 384 89% 397 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 63.3 4K Mixed 30.3 113% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 262 221% 321 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 137%
OOS1000G 1TB 4,080 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 600GB free SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 152 151 152 147 151 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Read 154 Write 145 Mixed 70.3 SusWrite 150 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BD160B.C16 1x8GB 2,135 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	23.6% Poor	MC Read 8.4 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 7.6 23% 8.13 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 3 14% 5 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 21: 0P 2R 2G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
21%	17%	52	208	56	60	21.7"	1280 720	GSM5AB8 LG IPS FULLHD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	1,193x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	506x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	498x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	568x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	482x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	413x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	348x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	170x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	151x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	148x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	92x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	90x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $287

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16