Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HM_GU603HM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive296% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HM_GU603HM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GU603HM
Memory17.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230627
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 12 '24 at 17:21
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 71.9
1-Core 168
2-Core 331
100% 190 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 784
83% 663 Pts
64-Core 1,069
66% 1,069 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 130C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3650 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.7% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 131
Parallax 122
104% 127 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 99.3
Splatting 90.4
88% 110 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU010TZ 1TB
495GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 922 988 253 145 572 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 2,749
Write 2,038
Mixed 1,484
SusWrite 505
376% 1,694 MB/s
4K Read 77.2
4K Write 229
4K Mixed 108
376% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 879
DQ Write 870
DQ Mixed 585
519% 778 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 296%
Great: 387%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
74.5% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 21.9
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 17.5
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 61: 0P 5R 9G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
61% 68% 34 217 57 240 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7058 LC32G7xT
Typical ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HM_GU603HM Builds (Compare 1,940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603HM_GU603HM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback