MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics41.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220516
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 12 '24 at 06:41
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 3000G-$52
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 155
60% 104 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 232
32% 236 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.9% Average
Lighting 50.5
Reflection 56.2
Parallax 73.4
41% 60 fps
MRender 58.5
Gravity 60.5
Splatting 43.5
43% 54.2 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
A400 120GB 120GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1A30Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 209 234 182 44 33 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.3% Poor
Read 0.2
Write 219
Mixed 3
SusWrite 118
20% 85 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 5.4
32% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 10.1
41% 91.8 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 78%
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
65GB free
Firmware: V8X04c26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 315 322 348 360 264 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 359
Write 325
Mixed 308
SusWrite 326
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 23.1
84% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 176
132% 172 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
550GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 155 157 158 156 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 143
Write 146
Mixed 84.4
SusWrite 156
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
203% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CG3200D4M13508G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
77.4% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 27.2
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 19
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 3 60 20" 1280 720 ACR01A4 Acer V203HL
Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $305
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback