Asus H110M-A/DP

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	93.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-A/DP (all builds)
Memory	26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190703
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 11 '24 at 21:20
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	76.9% Very good	Memory 85.7 1-Core 110 2-Core 219 78% 138 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 498 55% 436 Pts	64-Core 595 37% 595 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Gigabyte(1458 3792) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.76 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	93.3% Outstanding	Lighting 117 Reflection 131 Parallax 121 95% 123 fps	MRender 93.9 Gravity 125 Splatting 109 90% 109 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37240GB 240GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW201105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 76 97 61 88 273 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	55.9% Above average	Read 370 Write 136 Mixed 280 SusWrite 108 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 67.9 4K Mixed 12 100% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 15.2 44% 96.3 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: HP51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 116 115 117 115 116 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 127 Write 88.5 Mixed 69.5 SusWrite 115 73% 99.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-3G2E1 2x16GB 540 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 28.4 MC Mixed 22.7 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 29.5 SC Mixed 22.9 67% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 70.9 56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	60	21.5"	1280 720	HPN345C HP E223

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-A/DP Builds (Compare 351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/DP

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	78x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	73x
Core i5-6600KIntel $130Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	30x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	39x
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	26x
GTX 780Nvidia $329Bench 45%, 50,279 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	48x
CS900 240GBPNY $25Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	19x
P200 256GBPatriotBench 57%, 1,581 samples	17x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	38x
CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR2 Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 16GBCrucialBench 75%, 23 samples	18x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $347

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16