Asus ROG STRIX B650E-I GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 121%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive499% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B650E-I GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '24 at 21:06
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$320
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Memory 88.7
1-Core 214
2-Core 388
122% 230 Pts
4-Core 823
8-Core 1,567
142% 1,195 Pts
64-Core 2,895
179% 2,895 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 121%
Great: 126%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 147A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.76
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 180
Reflection 170
Parallax 164
147% 171 fps
Gravity 132
Splatting 113
107% 123 fps
Poor: 116% Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM790 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12237
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2401 3072 2991 3383 3506 3577 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
499% Outstanding
Read 3,711
Write 3,849
Mixed 3,041
SusWrite 3,155
775% 3,439 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 75.7
247% 83.9 MB/s
DQ Read 2,257
DQ Write 1,385
DQ Mixed 1,510
1,209% 1,717 MB/s
Poor: 294%
This bench: 499%
Great: 648%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$190
2TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 477 457 457 454 475 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 478
Mixed 431
SusWrite 462
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 52.4
176% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 376
DQ Mixed 377
284% 380 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 120%
Great: 136%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
82GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 257 238 230 224 217 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 438
Mixed 438
SusWrite 266
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 49.6
170% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 345
257% 339 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 104%
Great: 129%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
264GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 123 123 123 124 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 162
Write 178
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 124
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82%
Great: 112%
Asmedia ASM1053E 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 74 75 75 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 136
Write 147
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 74.3
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6000Z30 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
184% Outstanding
MC Read 74
MC Write 64.8
MC Mixed 63.2
192% 67.3 GB/s
SC Read 53.1
SC Write 63.6
SC Mixed 60.6
169% 59.1 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 145%
This bench: 184%
Great: 218%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27.9" 1280 720 AUS28B1 ASUS VP28U
Typical ROG STRIX B650E-I GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B650E-I GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $2,240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback