Asus CM6850

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus CM6850 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CM6850
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111221
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Mar 11 '24 at 16:54
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$192 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Memory 92.2 1-Core 89.5 2-Core 161 69% 114 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 393 42% 337 Pts	64-Core 431 27% 431 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 530 5,672 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 839B) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.22% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 5.5 Parallax 1.9 3% 3.73 fps	MRender 5.5 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 3.3 4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.22% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 341 338 340 340 342 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	71% Very good	Read 369 Write 322 Mixed 342 SusWrite 342 77% 344 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 51.4 4K Mixed 31.8 104% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 38 DQ Write 89.1 DQ Mixed 51.1 42% 59.4 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 123%
HP S700 250GB-$46 9,815 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 192GB free Firmware: S0212B1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 85 53 49 55 56 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.1% Below average	Read 210 Write 192 Mixed 201 SusWrite 83.8 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 37.8 4K Mixed 19.2 76% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 31.8 DQ Write 77.6 DQ Mixed 25.3 28% 44.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1333EL Series Corsair CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 1333EL Series Corsair CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.2% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 15 46% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 15.3 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	44	12	75	31.5"	1280 720	SAM7000 C32R50x

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CM6850 Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6850

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $192Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	99x
Core i5-2320Intel $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples	10x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	5x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	11x
GeForce GT 530NvidiaBench 3%, 5,672 samples	10x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	8x

SSD
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $31Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	7x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	11x
SLZ302G08-MDJHB 4x2GBUnknownBench 45%, 226 samples	7x
SLA302G08-GGNHC SLA302G08-GGNHC SLA302G08-GGNHC RMB4GB684CA3-16IC 16GBUnknownBench 44%, 5 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $223

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16