Intel X99-P4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemINTEL
MotherboardIntel X99-P4  (all builds)
Memory50.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '24 at 16:15
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 173
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 686
61% 517 Pts
64-Core 1,382
86% 1,382 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
ASRock(1849 5217) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.2.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.7% Average
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 135
Parallax 173
0% 103 fps
MRender 207
Gravity 92
Splatting 161
125% 153 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 91%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U256G1127 256GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4162000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 194 190 183 158 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 447
Write 301
Mixed 188
SusWrite 178
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 27
88% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 232
187% 267 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40BB1-CRC 2x31.5GB
2 of 8 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.2% Good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 22.9
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 19
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 57 75 31.5" 1280 720 GSM771E LG QHD
Typical X99-P4 Builds (Compare 335 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99-P4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback