HP Laptop 14-em0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 14-em0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B27
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '24 at 15:40
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U Graphics
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
60% Good
Memory 59
1-Core 103
2-Core 202
66% 121 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 484
51% 406 Pts
64-Core 479
30% 479 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8B27) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.46.11
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.87% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 11.6
3% 8.97 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 6.1
6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.87%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1006 512GB
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 512 527 441 539 561 562 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 604
Write 550
Mixed 557
SusWrite 524
126% 558 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 36.9
124% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 450
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 336
240% 316 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 108%
Great: 413%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G56AK6BX069N 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.2% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 18.5
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 17.8
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 50 60 14" 1280 720 AUODC90
Typical Laptop 14-em0xxx Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-em0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback