Asus P8P67-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110510
Uptime	8.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 11 '24 at 13:09
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$191 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 92.3 1-Core 83.6 2-Core 163 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 272 8-Core 390 41% 331 Pts	64-Core 384 24% 384 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Palit(1569 1184) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.64 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	35.7% Below average	Lighting 41.4 Reflection 37.9 Parallax 54.7 34% 44.7 fps	MRender 54.2 Gravity 51.5 Splatting 42.1 40% 49.3 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 233 228 223 195 204 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	65.4% Good	Read 257 Write 240 Mixed 189 SusWrite 219 51% 226 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 59 4K Mixed 30.1 111% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 163 DQ Mixed 166 127% 171 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40 52,322 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 178GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 93 92 92 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 88.1 Write 93.1 Mixed 65 SusWrite 91.8 62% 84.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-014.A00LF 2x4GB 238 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	49.8% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 15.7 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 15.4 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 62.7 64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	60	34.1"	3440 1377	SAM711A LC34G55T

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67-M PRO Builds (Compare 388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M PRO - $150

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	120x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	68x
Core i7-2600Intel $191Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	61x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	31x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	25x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	20x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	10x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	10x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	7x
99U5471-012.A00LF 4x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,349 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $554

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16