Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '24 at 11:47
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 83.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 239
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 667
72% 572 Pts
64-Core 530
33% 530 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$301
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60.1
49% 60 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 49%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 42 78 38 36 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 325
Write 127
Mixed 51.4
SusWrite 54.5
30% 140 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 4.7
40% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 31.3
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 16.4
14% 21.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 100%
XPG GAMMIX S41 256GB
15GB free
Firmware: VB421D63
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,833
Write 1,106
Mixed 1,128
299% 1,356 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 33.5
156% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 719
DQ Write 765
DQ Mixed 780
576% 755 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 262%
Walram 1TB 1TB
77GB free
Firmware: V0523B0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1443
Write 1369
Mixed 901
275% 1,238 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 24.9
138% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 541
DQ Write 784
DQ Mixed 387
370% 571 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 247%
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB
43GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 69 69 70 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 65.9
Write 36
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 69.4
39% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$78
77GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 48 48 46 47 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 61.4
Write 48.5
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 47.4
36% 49.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2666 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 12.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 6 165 23.8" 1920 1009 CHD0000 PMG24P980FG
Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,837 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $461
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback