Asus TUF Gaming FX505GM_FX505GM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 months ago, 2 months ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505GM_FX505GM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505GM
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200525
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 11 '24 at 05:00
Run Duration	252 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Memory 80.7 1-Core 62.9 2-Core 122 55% 88.6 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 332 33% 269 Pts	64-Core 332 20% 332 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1B9E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	5.29% Terrible	Lighting 5.6 Reflection 7.9 Parallax 6.7 5% 6.73 fps	MRender 9.1 Gravity 5.4 Splatting 9.6 7% 8.03 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.29% Great: 6%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB 16,774 User benchmarks, average bench 141% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 921 Write 1080 Mixed 986 223% 996 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 50.3 4K Mixed 36.1 117% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 357 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 315 238% 321 MB/s
Poor: 86% Great: 187%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 931GB free Firmware: JU0C0J Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 147 Write 136 Mixed 53.7 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.5 152% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB 353 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2133, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	62.7% Good	MC Read 24 MC Write 24.9 MC Mixed 18.8 64% 22.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 22.7 SC Mixed 16.9 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 80.5 50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	56	60	15.5"	1280 720	CMN15E8

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GM_FX505GM Builds (Compare 541 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GM_FX505GM

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	371x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	170x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	276x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	265x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	102x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	93x
WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 148%, 3,002 samples	36x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	79x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	68x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	60x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16