Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive378% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220104
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 10 '24 at 00:42
Run Duration319 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 88.1
1-Core 143
2-Core 284
94% 172 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 1,036
94% 789 Pts
64-Core 1,467
91% 1,467 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700
XFX(1EAE 661A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 10GB, Driver: 24.2.1
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 136
Parallax 243
94% 164 fps
MRender 215
Gravity 121
Splatting 197
147% 178 fps
Poor: 106%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2090 1938 1934 1949 1946 1931 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
378% Outstanding
Read 2,597
Write 2,601
Mixed 2442
SusWrite 1,965
541% 2,401 MB/s
4K Read 74.6
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 97.8
328% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,293
DQ Write 1,034
DQ Mixed 1,143
861% 1,156 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 378%
Great: 435%
CT2000P3PSSD8 2TB
561GB free
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3339 3684 3832 3826 2784 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
409% Outstanding
Read 1,971
Write 3,937
Mixed 2,467
SusWrite 2,926
643% 2,825 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 86.2
299% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1495
DQ Write 1,147
DQ Mixed 1,301
978% 1,314 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 409%
Great: 517%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
104GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 432 422 454 437 422 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 225
Mixed 272
SusWrite 438
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 88.3
4K Mixed 52.5
177% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 177
144% 206 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 111%
Great: 126%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
169GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 12,283
Write 9,333
Mixed 10,200
2,358% 10,605 MB/s
4K Read 682
4K Write 344
4K Mixed 166
1,428% 397 MB/s
DQ Read 1,707
DQ Write 1,288
DQ Mixed 1,385
1,066% 1,460 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
679GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 147 147 146 147 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 153
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 147
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
228% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
747GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 148 149 147 148 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 137
Write 144
Mixed 90.4
SusWrite 148
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 40.4
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 28.3
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 41.8
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 101%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 75 27" 1280 720 ACR0B79 KB272 E
Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO Builds (Compare 1,971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $970
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback