HP OMEN by HP Laptop 16-b0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics93.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive287% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 16-b0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 88F4
Memory53.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230131
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '24 at 22:20
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Memory 78.4
1-Core 156
2-Core 301
96% 178 Pts
4-Core 582
8-Core 998
96% 790 Pts
64-Core 1,361
84% 1,361 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
HP(103C 88F4) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4626
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.1% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 121
Parallax 112
98% 118 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 95
Splatting 85.4
84% 105 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 EVO 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1194 880 827 776 784 726 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 2,409
Write 2,252
Mixed 1,651
SusWrite 864
401% 1,794 MB/s
4K Read 55.5
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 82.4
290% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,205
DQ Write 965
DQ Mixed 1,058
799% 1,076 MB/s
Poor: 174%
This bench: 287%
Great: 390%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905744-067.A00G 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.8% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 27.8
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 17.2
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 16" 1280 720 CMN1602
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 16-b0xxx Builds (Compare 2,697 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 16-b0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback