Asus ROG Strix G533ZW_G533ZW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 153%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive427% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemAsus ROG Strix G533ZW_G533ZW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G533ZW
Memory5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230221
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateMar 09 '24 at 16:45
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 66.7
1-Core 193
2-Core 373
108% 211 Pts
4-Core 716
8-Core 1,238
118% 977 Pts
64-Core 2,140
132% 2,140 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 100%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti (Laptop)
Asus(1043 1C92) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1830 MHz, MLim: 3550 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Lighting 191
Reflection 195
Parallax 178
155% 188 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 141
Splatting 126
122% 153 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 135%
Great: 135%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3076 2355 1739 1735 1744 1765 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
427% Outstanding
Read 3032
Write 3,784
Mixed 3,016
SusWrite 2069
671% 2,975 MB/s
4K Read 85.2
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 123
400% 141 MB/s
DQ Read 1,360
DQ Write 1,080
DQ Mixed 1,171
890% 1,204 MB/s
Poor: 187%
This bench: 427%
Great: 464%
Nvme Predator SSD GM7 M.2 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SN12717 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3283 4124 4258 4184 4238 4100 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
565% Outstanding
Read 3,146
Write 3,948
Mixed 3,062
SusWrite 4,031
803% 3,547 MB/s
4K Read 82.2
4K Write 257
4K Mixed 118
412% 152 MB/s
DQ Read 1,719
DQ Write 1,208
DQ Mixed 1,210
972% 1,379 MB/s
Poor: 330%
This bench: 565%
Great: 590%
Disco virtual de Microsoft 704GB
362GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1306 1986 1701 1749 1854 1841 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
132% Outstanding
MC Read 56.9
MC Write 47.8
MC Mixed 48.6
146% 51.1 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 47.6
SC Mixed 25.5
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 132%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 300 15.5" 1280 720 TMX1561 TL156VDXP0101
Typical ROG Strix G533ZW_G533ZW Builds (Compare 1,258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO

System: Asus ROG Strix G533ZW_G533ZW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback