Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 110% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 months ago, 2 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230201
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Mar 09 '24 at 11:50
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-11400F-$116 46,609 User benchmarks, average bench 94% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Memory 90.7 1-Core 142 2-Core 287 95% 173 Pts	4-Core 538 8-Core 900 88% 719 Pts	64-Core 1,109 69% 1,109 Pts
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293 48,534 User benchmarks, average bench 122% Asus(1043 8903) CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	112% Outstanding	Lighting 168 Reflection 156 Parallax 159 137% 161 fps	MRender 73.7 Gravity 113 Splatting 85.5 74% 90.8 fps
Poor: 115% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 127%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2KB240G8 240GB 205 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: XCV10132 SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 254 247 248 242 247 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Read 292 Write 247 Mixed 277 SusWrite 249 60% 266 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 65.8 4K Mixed 27.9 108% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 250 DQ Mixed 235 184% 254 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 86%
Intel HBRPEKNX0101A 256GB 152 User benchmarks, average bench 123% 151GB free Firmware: G003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 400 51 79 70 28 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 759 Write 454 Mixed 509 SusWrite 168 105% 473 MB/s	4K Read 45.3 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 55.4 194% 67.6 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 452 DQ Mixed 209 188% 275 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 150%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB 58,684 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	99.7% Outstanding	MC Read 38.8 MC Write 36.2 MC Mixed 33.2 103% 36.1 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 34.7 SC Mixed 27.8 81% 28.4 GB/s	Latency 60.3 66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 99.7% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	55	60	27"	1280 720	SAM0C16 S27E391

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,008 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 98%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 98%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

CPU
Core i5-11400FIntel $116Bench 94%, 46,609 samples	558x
Core i5-11400Intel $130Bench 94%, 24,459 samples	329x
Core i7-11700KIntel $235Bench 101%, 65,651 samples	302x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	456x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	292x
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	170x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $75Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	85x
SA2000M81000G 1TBKingstonBench 234%, 77,062 samples	84x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	82x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	194x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	108x
KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GBKingstonBench 91%, 43,162 samples	93x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $441

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16