Gigabyte GA-B460 AORUS PRO AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B460 AORUS PRO AC  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200408
Uptime7 Days
Run DateMar 09 '24 at 10:52
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Memory 89.8
1-Core 141
2-Core 277
93% 169 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 859
86% 702 Pts
64-Core 1,192
74% 1,192 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Gigabyte(1458 3FF3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 249
Parallax 178
143% 201 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 146
Splatting 121
118% 148 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 128%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 195 149 33 160 148 MB/s
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.3% Above average
Read 226
Write 111
Mixed 204
SusWrite 143
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 63.6
4K Mixed 27.5
103% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 119
118% 187 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 100%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
509GB free
Firmware: SBFK61F1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 363 418 208 309 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 439
Write 405
Mixed 354
SusWrite 285
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 37.9
142% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 228
198% 291 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 102%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
852GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1C3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 376 430 442 443 444 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 408
Write 435
Mixed 371
SusWrite 411
92% 406 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 37
133% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 204
179% 264 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 102%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
3TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 163 162 161 161 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 151
Write 130
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 161
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
3TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 155 152 149 155 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 142
Write 96.3
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 150
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AR36C18S8K2HU416R 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
91.4% Outstanding
MC Read 33
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 28.5
94% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 38.3
SC Mixed 26.7
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 68.3
58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 25 144 27.6" 1280 720 ACR0000 ED270R
Typical GA-B460 AORUS PRO AC Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B460 AORUS PRO AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $682
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback