PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 30.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION (all builds) |
Memory | 49.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140109 |
Uptime | 5.5 Days |
Run Date | Mar 08 '24 at 19:30 |
Run Duration | 226 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 39% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
|
36%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Asus(1043 8499) 3GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 474.44
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
34.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 111 112 103 106 MB/s
|
30.6%
Below average
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 130 130 130 131 133 MB/s
|
77.8%
Very good
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
516GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 72 43 40 61 53 MB/s
|
41.1%
Average
|
|||
51%
Above average
|
||||
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
44GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 91 90 92 90 MB/s
|
60.2%
Good
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
636GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 69 66 67 71 72 MB/s
|
37.3%
Below average
|
|||
WD My Book 1TB
68GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 30 30 31 30 MB/s
|
17%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
53.9%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 22 | 1 | 60 | 31.5" | 1280 720 | AUS32E0 ASUS VG32VQ1B |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4930KIntel $100Bench 77%, 22,204 samples | 286x |
Core i7-4960XIntel $1,189Bench 78%, 5,121 samples | 122x |
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples | 109x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 47x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 46x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 42x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $431 |