Fujitsu CELSIUS_J550

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS_J550 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3427-A1
Memory	27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210929
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 08 '24 at 17:14
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 2,434 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	81.8% Excellent	Memory 82 1-Core 114 2-Core 216 78% 137 Pts	4-Core 443 8-Core 610 66% 527 Pts	64-Core 609 38% 609 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% HP(103C 8558) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.99 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.1% Average	Lighting 56.3 Reflection 55.7 Parallax 48.9 46% 53.6 fps	MRender 43 Gravity 50.1 Splatting 45 38% 46 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 46%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119 20,782 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 824 Write 561 Mixed 634 149% 673 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 97.9 4K Mixed 45.6 155% 57.7 MB/s	DQ Read 504 DQ Write 525 DQ Mixed 471 366% 500 MB/s
Poor: 95% Great: 144%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 24GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 68 Write 31.7 Mixed 46.7 57% 48.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.3 88% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB 16,068 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 0GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 14.5 Write 1.2 Mixed 5.5 7% 7.07 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GU7AFR8N-TF 4x8GB 95 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	73.4% Very good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 29 MC Mixed 23.3 74% 26 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 29.8 SC Mixed 23.3 66% 23.1 GB/s	Latency 76.9 52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	60	16.6"	1280 720	CHD0240 24VCF

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS_J550 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS_J550

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	7x
Xeon E3-1245 v5IntelBench 76%, 2,081 samples	4x
Xeon E3-1240 v5IntelBench 77%, 2,434 samples	4x

GPU
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples	5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	3x

SSD
MZNTY256HDHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 87%, 2,168 samples	4x
MZ7LN512HMJP-00000 512GBSamsungBench 106%, 425 samples	2x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GBBench 78%, 6,868 samples	2x

RAM
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 16,202 samples	2x
M378A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 75%, 1,504 samples	2x
M378A5143EB1-CPB 2x4GBSamsungBench 68%, 4,308 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $237

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16